Manu Bhaker, a two-time Olympic medallist, was asked about teenage cricketer Vaibhav Sooryavanshi — and social media isn’t happy. Here’s why

Manu Bhaker found herself at the centre of an unexpected debate after being asked about teenage cricket sensation Vaibhav Sooryavanshi during a media interaction — a moment that has sparked backlash online.

Bhaker, a double bronze medallist at the 2024 Paris Olympics, responded with composure, emphasising the importance of mentorship and the right environment for young talent. She noted that age is no barrier to success if guidance and support systems are strong.

However, the question itself drew criticism on social media, with many arguing that an Olympic medallist should not have been asked about a cricketer at an unrelated event. The episode has reignited a familiar debate over cricket’s overwhelming dominance in India’s sporting landscape and the perceived lack of attention to other disciplines.

Sooryavanshi’s meteoric rise

The 15-year-old has become one of the biggest talking points in Indian cricket after standout performances in the Under-19 World Cup and Indian Premier League 2026 season. He currently sits among the top run-scorers in the Orange Cap race.

Sooryavanshi grabbed headlines with a blistering century on IPL debut season and followed it up with a match-winning 175 in the U19 World Cup final. Representing Rajasthan Royals, he has continued his form this season, piling up runs at a rapid strike rate, including a recent hundred against Sunrisers Hyderabad.

His exploits have earned praise from international stars like Pat Cummins, who described him as his “new favourite cricketer.”

Bigger conversation beyond one question

While Bhaker handled the situation diplomatically, the incident has amplified concerns about unequal recognition across sports in India. Many online users argued that achievements in disciplines like shooting often receive less attention compared to cricket, despite global success.

The debate continues as Sooryavanshi’s rise fuels excitement on the field, even as it highlights broader questions about sporting priorities off it.