Trump draws up ‘naughty or nice’ list for allies over Iran war stance

1

The Trump administration has reportedly drawn up a “naughty and nice” list ranking NATO allies based on their defence contributions and support for the US-led war involving Iran, according to a report.

The list, prepared ahead of NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte’s recent visit to Washington, is seen as a way to reward supportive allies while penalising those who declined to back the conflict, Politico reported.

A European diplomat told the outlet the move reflects an idea earlier floated by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who suggested “model allies” could receive preferential treatment, while those falling short on collective defence obligations might face consequences.

Potential measures under consideration reportedly include relocating US troops or restricting access to American defence technology. However, some officials cautioned that such steps could backfire on the United States itself.

Countries like Poland and Romania are expected to be rated favourably due to their defence contributions and operational support, including allowing US forces to use military bases.

By contrast, many NATO members have declined to participate in the Gulf conflict, drawing criticism from Donald Trump. Speaking at an event in Arizona, Trump said the alliance had offered help too late, adding that the US no longer needed their support.

His remarks underscore longstanding tensions between Washington and NATO allies, which have deepened during the conflict. Trump has repeatedly criticised European nations for low defence spending and has clashed with allies on issues ranging from burden-sharing to strategic priorities.

Following talks with Rutte, Trump reiterated his frustration on social media, saying NATO had failed to support the US when needed and warning it might do so again in the future.

Strains between the White House and NATO had already been high before the Iran conflict, with disagreements over defence spending and broader geopolitical issues further complicating relations.

Comments are closed.